Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorR. J., Wilding-
dc.contributor.authorM., Thynne-
dc.contributor.authorM. M. F., Subhan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T07:03:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T07:03:25Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-023-02348-0-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/7056-
dc.descriptionCC BYvi
dc.description.abstractMaximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is currently the most commonly used measure for respiratory muscle strength (RMS) estimation, however, requires significant effort. Falsely low values are therefore common, especially in fatigue-prone subjects, such as neuromuscular disorder patients. In contrast, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) requires a short, sharp sniff; this is a natural manoeuvre, decreasing required effort. Consequently, it has been suggested that use of SNIP could confirm the accuracy of MIP measurements. However, no recent guidelines regarding the optimal method of SNIP measurement exist, and varied approaches have been described.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectMaximal inspiratory pressurevi
dc.subjectsniff nasal inspiratory pressurevi
dc.titleOptimization of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) measurement methodology in healthy subjectsvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in Collections
OER- Y học- Điều dưỡng

Files in This Item: