Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Farag | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nada Ibrahim, Hendi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rehab Adel, Diab | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-27T03:54:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-27T03:54:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00540-022-03129-5 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/7162 | - |
| dc.description | CC BY | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | Perioperative pain management related to hip surgical procedures is challenging. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel technique that is assumed to provide better analgesia in addition to its post-operative motor-sparing effect. In this review, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of PENG block on pain management in patients undergoing hip surgeries. Fifteen clinical trials with a total of 837 patients were included. Pain scores favored PENG group when compared to FICB group (fascia iliaca compartment block) or analgesics-only group, but the difference could only be detected in the early post-operative period. Afterward, it seems to lose its superiority, and no difference could be detected. In addition, cumulative opioid consumption favored PENG group at 24 h but not at 48 h. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
| dc.subject | Pericapsular nerve group | vi |
| dc.subject | safety and efficacy | vi |
| dc.title | Does pericapsular nerve group block have limited analgesia at the initial post-operative period? Systematic review and meta-analysis | vi |
| dc.type | Book | vi |
| Appears in Collections | ||
| OER- Y học- Điều dưỡng | ||
Files in This Item:
