Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Armstrong-
dc.contributor.authorDamiano, Brigo-
dc.contributor.authorAlex S. L., Tse-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-13T09:17:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-13T09:17:40Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-023-05295-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/7908-
dc.descriptionCC BYvi
dc.description.abstractPrevious literature shows that prevalent risk measures such as value at risk or expected shortfall are ineffective to curb excessive risk-taking by a tail-risk-seeking trader with S-shaped utility function in the context of portfolio optimisation. However, these conclusions hold only when the constraints are static in the sense that the risk measure is just applied to the terminal portfolio value. In this paper, we consider a portfolio optimisation problem featuring S-shaped utility and a dynamic risk constraint which is imposed throughout the entire trading horizon.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectprevalent risk measuresvi
dc.subjectentire trading horizonvi
dc.titleThe importance of dynamic risk constraints for limited liability operatorsvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in CollectionsOER - Kinh tế và Quản lý

Files in This Item: