Item Infomation
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hamid R., Jamali | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alireza, Abbasi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-26T04:06:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-26T04:06:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04685-7 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/8327 | - |
dc.description | CC BY | vi |
dc.description.abstract | Despite improvement in gender inequality in Australian science, the problem has not been fully addressed yet. To better understand the nature of gender inequality in Australian science, all gendered Australian first authored articles published between 2010 and 2020 and indexed in the Dimensions database were analysed. Field of Research (FoR) was used as the subject classification of articles and Field Citation Ratio (FCR) was used for citation comparison. Overall, the ratio of female to male first authored articles increased over the years, and this was true for all FoRs except for information and computing sciences. The ratio of single-authored articles by females was also improved over the study period. Females appeared to have a citation advantage, using Field Citation Ratio, over males in a few FoRs including mathematical sciences, chemical sciences, technology, built environment and design, studies in human society, law and legal studies, and studies in creative arts and writing. | vi |
dc.language.iso | en | vi |
dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
dc.subject | FoR | vi |
dc.subject | FCR | vi |
dc.title | Gender gaps in Australian research publishing, citation and co-authorship | vi |
dc.type | Book | vi |
Appears in Collections | ||
OER - Công nghệ thông tin |
Files in This Item:
Restricted Access
Size : 1,09 MB
Format : Adobe PDF