Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Rieg-
dc.contributor.authorUte, Vanini-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T01:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-17T01:44:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-023-00630-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/8465-
dc.descriptionCC Byvi
dc.description.abstractBecause mandatory disclosure of intellectual capital (IC) is restricted by accounting regulations, companies invest in voluntary IC disclosure (ICD) to reduce information asymmetries and support an adequate firm valuation by investors and other stakeholders. So far numerous studies analysing the value relevance of voluntary ICD have been published revealing mixed results. Thus, it is the purpose of this paper to statistically integrate and to explain the heterogeneity of results by applying a meta-analysis with 122 effects of 40 primary studies. Our results mainly support the value relevance of voluntary ICD resulting in higher market value, lower cost of equity, and higher accounting performance. We identify weak moderating effects for legal origin, different IC categories and journal ranking. For further improving of disclosure quality, standard setters should develop disclosure standards for voluntary ICD.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectICDvi
dc.subjectICvi
dc.titleValue relevance of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure a meta-analysisvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in Collections
OER - Kinh tế và Quản lý

Files in This Item: