Thông tin tài liệu
Thông tin siêu dữ liệu biểu ghi
| Trường DC | Giá trị | Ngôn ngữ | 
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Robert, Rieg | - | 
| dc.contributor.author | Ute, Vanini | - | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-17T01:44:46Z | - | 
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-17T01:44:46Z | - | 
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - | 
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-023-00630-3 | - | 
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/8465 | - | 
| dc.description | CC By | vi | 
| dc.description.abstract | Because mandatory disclosure of intellectual capital (IC) is restricted by accounting regulations, companies invest in voluntary IC disclosure (ICD) to reduce information asymmetries and support an adequate firm valuation by investors and other stakeholders. So far numerous studies analysing the value relevance of voluntary ICD have been published revealing mixed results. Thus, it is the purpose of this paper to statistically integrate and to explain the heterogeneity of results by applying a meta-analysis with 122 effects of 40 primary studies. Our results mainly support the value relevance of voluntary ICD resulting in higher market value, lower cost of equity, and higher accounting performance. We identify weak moderating effects for legal origin, different IC categories and journal ranking. For further improving of disclosure quality, standard setters should develop disclosure standards for voluntary ICD. | vi | 
| dc.language.iso | en | vi | 
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi | 
| dc.subject | ICD | vi | 
| dc.subject | IC | vi | 
| dc.title | Value relevance of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure a meta-analysis | vi | 
| dc.type | Book | vi | 
| Bộ sưu tập | ||
| OER - Kinh tế và Quản lý | ||
Danh sách tệp tin đính kèm:

