Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScherz, Antoinette-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T08:06:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-19T08:06:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42439-023-00079-8-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9092-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractCourts are often criticised as undemocratic. The backlash against international courts in the last decade is also partly driven by this concern. Human rights courts’ legitimacy is particularly challenged because they aim to protect human rights against the very states that need to comply with and implement the courts’ judgements. Therefore, several international courts have developed mechanisms of deference to states. One especially interesting tool is the European Court of Human Rights’ margin of appreciation doctrine. This paper proposes that the margin of appreciation can ensure the conditions of personal autonomy by protecting human rights while respecting the democratic decisions of states. Yet, states’ decisions should only be respected insofar as they realise political autonomy.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectundemocraticvi
dc.subjectCourtsvi
dc.titleHow Should Personal and Political Autonomy Feature in the ECtHR’s Margin of Appreciation?vi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in CollectionsOER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item: