Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSzwed, Marcin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T08:35:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-20T08:35:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-023-00191-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9115-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractThis article seeks to answer the question of how to deal with the problem of unlawful judicial appointments in Poland in a way consistent with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). According to the Polish Constitution, appointments of judges are made upon the request of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ). After controversial reforms in 2017, this body lost its independence from politicians. In the four judgments issued so far, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that appointments of Supreme Court judges made upon the request of politicised NCJ were burdened with manifest violation of domestic law and, as a result, panels of courts composed of persons appointed in this way were not ‘tribunal established by law’. Arguably, this conclusion may be extended to other judges appointed in the same way.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectECHRvi
dc.subjectNCJvi
dc.titleFixing the Problem of Unlawfully Appointed Judges in Poland in the Light of the ECHRvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in CollectionsOER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item: