Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | El-Farahaty, Hanem | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T03:35:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-22T03:35:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-023-09991-0 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9142 | - |
| dc.description | CC-BY | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | Gendered language is becoming a matter of serious concern for legal drafters and policymakers because 'it is always changing as societal views change' (The University of Calgary: Office of diversity, equity and protected disclosure 2017:1). Many western countries have made considerable progress towards using inclusive legal language. However, inclusive language is not implemented in other parts of the World; the Arab World is no exception. This may be due to the violation of language rules, the decline of language, and the lack of enough evidence that changing the language will change society (Brown in ABA J, 2019) and (Brown in ABA J: 24–26, 2018). In this paper, I explore the challenging socio-cultural and linguistic factors that may hinder the implementation of gender-inclusive language in Arabic and explain the current situation in two current constitutions of Egypt and Tunisia in particular. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
| dc.subject | Investigation of Gender Terminology | vi |
| dc.title | A Comparative Investigation of Gender Terminology in the Egyptian and Tunisian Constitutions | vi |
| dc.type | Book | vi |
| Appears in Collections | ||
| OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội | ||
Files in This Item:
