Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Vries, Bouke de | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T06:53:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-22T06:53:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11572-021-09622-4 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9153 | - |
| dc.description | CC-BY | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | Over the past decade, countries such as France, Belgium, Denmark, Austria, Latvia, and Bulgaria have banned face-coverings from public spaces. These bans are popularly known as ‘burqa bans’ as they seem to have been drafted with the aim of preventing people from wearing burqas and niqabs specifically. The scholarly response to these bans has been overwhelmingly negative, with several lawyers and philosophers arguing that they violate the human right to freedom of religion. While this article shares some of the concerns that have been raised, it argues that banning face-coverings in public is morally justified under certain conditions with the exception of facemasks that are necessary for the containment of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
| dc.subject | Sociability Argument | vi |
| dc.subject | Qualified Defence | vi |
| dc.title | The Sociability Argument for the Burqa Ban A Qualified Defence | vi |
| dc.type | Book | vi |
| Appears in Collections | OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội | |
Files in This Item:
