Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorŻelechowski, Łukasz-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T08:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-22T08:27:05Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01350-7-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9160-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractThe grounds for refusal or invalidity relating to trade marks filed in bad faith or being contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality are based entirely on undefined concepts and require a value judgement to be made by the adjudicating authorities. This openness has led to the exploration of new lanes for these grounds in case law beyond the traditional scope of their application. This paper examines how the flexibility of the concepts at hand has led to considerable uncertainty in assessing whether a particular mark is registered in bad faith or offends against morality and public policy – and in some cases both. In particular, the objective, consistent viewpoint of the average consumer, which is normally applied in other areas of trade mark law, appears to be exiled from the analysis in these cases.vi
dc.language.isoesvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectBad Faithvi
dc.subjectPublic Policyvi
dc.titleBad Faith, Public Policy and Morality: How Open Concepts Shape Trade Mark Protectionvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in Collections
OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item: