Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Glogar, Ondřej | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-25T04:10:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-25T04:10:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-023-10010-5 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9188 | - |
| dc.description | Cc-BY | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | Many legal theorists and linguists have addressed the notion of legal language from different perspectives. Despite that, the definitions of legal language vary. Almost all of the approaches conclude that legal language entails several types of communication. Nevertheless, not all of these categories are sufficiently researched. Some types of legal communication seem to be neglected. This lack of interest might be rooted in the uncertainty of whether these texts or utterances even fall under the scope of the concept of legal language. In order to avoid this superficiality in subsequent research, it is first necessary to come to a clear determination of which communicative acts can be considered a part of legal language and which cannot. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
| dc.subject | Concept of Legal Language | vi |
| dc.subject | Legal Language ‘Legal‘ | vi |
| dc.title | The Concept of Legal Language: What Makes Legal Language ‘Legal‘? | vi |
| dc.type | Book | vi |
| Appears in Collections | ||
| OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội | ||
Files in This Item:
