Item Infomation
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eidenmüller, Horst | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-26T03:17:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-26T03:17:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40804-023-00271-9 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9228 | - |
dc.description | CC-BY | vi |
dc.description.abstract | In this article, I discuss the possibilities and limitations of restructuring laws against the background of geopolitical shocks such as the Covid-19 pandemic and the current energy crisis. I make two claims, one narrow and focused on German bankruptcy law, and one broad with a cross-jurisdictional reach. My narrow claim relates to ‘StaRUG’, the new German restructuring regime. I argue that this law is a superfluous and flawed instrument. It should be repealed. My second claim is much broader. I argue that bankruptcy laws, including restructuring laws, are generally ill-suited to deal with the economic consequences of geopolitical or macroeconomic shocks as a ‘first line of defence’. Bankruptcy laws are not designed to provide the structural assistance at scale which the businesses affected by these shocks need. | vi |
dc.language.iso | en | vi |
dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
dc.subject | Restructuring Laws | vi |
dc.title | What Can Restructuring Laws Do? Geopolitical Shocks, the New German Restructuring Regime, and the Limits of Restructuring Laws | vi |
dc.type | Book | vi |
Appears in Collections | ||
OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội |
Files in This Item: