Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Davina-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T07:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-27T07:05:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-022-09515-4-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9288-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the challenge of developing a feminist law reform proposal to decertify sex and gender based on research conducted for the ‘Future of Legal Gender' project. Locating the proposal to decertify within a do-it-yourself, prefigurative approach to law reform, the article asks: Can a law reform proposal be both instrumental and radical? Can a proposal take shape as a viable legislative text and as a more subversive intervention to unsettle and reimagine gender’s relationship to law? This article explores this at two levels. First, it considers the ontological challenges of developing a controversial law reform proposal in terms of its realness (or fictiveness), contours, and temporality, turning to ‘slow law' as a credible way of approaching radical reform.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectCrafting Prefigurative Lawvi
dc.subjectDIY Law Reformvi
dc.titleCrafting Prefigurative Law in Turbulent Times: Decertification, DIY Law Reform, and the Dilemmas of Feminist Prototypingvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in CollectionsOER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item: