Item Infomation
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Mazzucco, Marcus | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Findlay, Hilary | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-27T07:47:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-27T07:47:00Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10991-022-09316-4 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9297 | - |
| dc.description | CC-BY | vi |
| dc.description.abstract | The interests of athletes are a fundamental aspect of the Olympic Movement. Yet, athletes face jurisdictional barriers when attempting to advance their interests and challenge the International Olympic Committee (IOC)’s exercise of authority over the Olympic Movement, including the IOC’s decisions regarding which sport events are included in the Olympic Games. Previous attempts to challenge the IOC’s selection of sport events for the Olympic Games have been unsuccessful in national courts, as seen in the case of Sagen v. Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (“Sagen”) involving women’s ski jumping. | vi |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Springer | vi |
| dc.subject | IOC’s | vi |
| dc.subject | CAS | vi |
| dc.title | From Sagen to Henriques: Legal Challenges to Olympic Event Selection Decisions and the Role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport | vi |
| dc.type | Book | vi |
| Appears in Collections | ||
| OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội | ||
Files in This Item:
