Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGalli, Niccolò-
dc.contributor.authorBotta, Marco-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-29T03:14:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-29T03:14:14Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01287-x-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9364-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses controversial patent licensing conditions in the Information Communication Technology (ICT) sector as “unfair trading conditions” under Art. 102(a) TFEU. It argues that the application of the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation does not prevent the assessment of patent licensing conditions under Art. 102 if the licensor is dominant in the market. Hence, the article examines four categories of controversial licensing conditions in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union under Art. 102(a): grant-back clauses, no-challenge clauses, portfolio-wide licenses, and contract term decoupled from patent validity. Developing old precedents in new application cases, the abuse-of-dominance analysis finds that each license clause is capable of anti-competitive exploitative effects, as much as offsetting justifications. As a result, the qualification of any such clause as “unfair” needs a case-by-case approach considering the overall content of the ICT patent licensing agreement.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectTFEUvi
dc.subjectICTvi
dc.titleIt’s Unfair! Non-price Exploitation in ICT Patents Licensesvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in CollectionsOER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item: