Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHong Kong To Nguyen-
dc.contributor.authorManh Tung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorQuan-Hoang Vuong-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T02:05:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-27T02:05:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.nbr.org/publication/probing-vietnams-legal-prospects-in-the-south-china-sea-dispute/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/3303-
dc.description.abstractAlthough most Asian states are signatories to UNCLOS, which offers options for dispute resolution by either voluntary or compulsory processes, in reality fewer than a dozen Asian states have taken advantage of such an approach. The decision to adopt third-party mechanisms comes under great scrutiny and deliberation, not least because of the entailing legal procedures and the politically sensitive nature of disputes. Vietnam claims the second-largest maritime area in the South China Sea dispute after China. A comparison of two recent cases—the arbitration between the Philippines and China and the conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia—highlights the importance of selecting between binding and nonbinding decisions and framing a complaint. In particular, any legal action under UNCLOS should specify China’s claims and actions in areas that encroach on Vietnam’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and violate international law.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherAsia Policyvi
dc.subjectunclos-
dc.subjectmaritime law
dc.titleProbing Vietnam’s Legal Prospects in the South China Sea Disputevi
dc.typeBài tríchvi
Appears in Collections
Bài báo khoa học

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.