Item Infomation
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hong Kong To Nguyen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Manh Tung Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Quan-Hoang Vuong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-27T02:05:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T02:05:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.nbr.org/publication/probing-vietnams-legal-prospects-in-the-south-china-sea-dispute/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/3303 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although most Asian states are signatories to UNCLOS, which offers options for dispute resolution by either voluntary or compulsory processes, in reality fewer than a dozen Asian states have taken advantage of such an approach. The decision to adopt third-party mechanisms comes under great scrutiny and deliberation, not least because of the entailing legal procedures and the politically sensitive nature of disputes. Vietnam claims the second-largest maritime area in the South China Sea dispute after China. A comparison of two recent cases—the arbitration between the Philippines and China and the conciliation between Timor-Leste and Australia—highlights the importance of selecting between binding and nonbinding decisions and framing a complaint. In particular, any legal action under UNCLOS should specify China’s claims and actions in areas that encroach on Vietnam’s claimed exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and violate international law. | vi |
dc.language.iso | en | vi |
dc.publisher | Asia Policy | vi |
dc.subject | unclos | - |
dc.subject | maritime law | |
dc.title | Probing Vietnam’s Legal Prospects in the South China Sea Dispute | vi |
dc.type | Bài trích | vi |
Appears in Collections | ||
Bài báo khoa học |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.