Tìm kiếm

Tiêu chí lọc:


Tiêu chí lọc:


Tác giả

Chủ đề

Năm xuất bản

Toàn văn

Kết quả tìm kiếm

Hiện thị kết quả từ 1 đến 3 của 3
  • <<
  • 1
  • >>
  • Tác giả : Mara, Graziani; Lidia, Dutkiewicz; Davide, Calvaresi;  Người hướng dẫn: -;  Đồng tác giả: - (2023)

    Since its emergence in the 1960s, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has grown to conquer many technology products and their fields of application. Machine learning, as a major part of the current AI solutions, can learn from the data and through experience to reach high performance on various tasks. This growing success of AI algorithms has led to a need for interpretability to understand opaque models such as deep neural networks. Various requirements have been raised from different domains, together with numerous tools to debug, justify outcomes, and establish the safety, fairness and reliability of the models.

  • Tác giả : Rana, Khattab; Islam R., Abdelmaksoud; Samir, Abdelrazek;  Người hướng dẫn: -;  Đồng tác giả: - (2023)

    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), surprised the world in December 2019 and has threatened the lives of millions of people. Countries all over the world closed worship places and shops, prevented gatherings, and implemented curfews to stand against the spread of COVID-19. Deep Learning (DL) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) can have a great role in detecting and fighting this disease. Deep learning can be used to detect COVID-19 symptoms and signs from different imaging modalities, such as X-Ray, Computed Tomography (CT), and Ultrasound Images (US). This could help in identifying COVID-19 cases as a first step to curing them. In this paper, we reviewed the research studies conducted from January 2020 t...

  • Tác giả : Gizem, Yalcin; Erlis, Themeli; Evert, Stamhuis;  Người hướng dẫn: -;  Đồng tác giả: - (2022)

    Artificial Intelligence and algorithms are increasingly able to replace human workers in cognitively sophisticated tasks, including ones related to justice. Many governments and international organizations are discussing policies related to the application of algorithmic judges in courts. In this paper, we investigate the public perceptions of algorithmic judges. Across two experiments (N = 1,822), and an internal meta-analysis (N = 3,039), our results show that even though court users acknowledge several advantages of algorithms (i.e., cost and speed), they trust human judges more and have greater intentions to go to the court when a human (vs. an algorithmic) judge adjudicates.