Item Infomation

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHage, Jaap-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-29T07:26:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-29T07:26:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-022-09896-4-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dlib.phenikaa-uni.edu.vn/handle/PNK/9375-
dc.descriptionCC-BYvi
dc.description.abstractThis article describes how the facts in social reality take an intermediate position between objective facts and purely subjective ‘facts’. In turn, these social facts can be subdivided into constructivist and non-constructivist facts. The defining difference is that non-constructivist facts are completely determined by an approximate consensus between the members of a social group, while constructivist facts are founded in such a consensus but can nevertheless be questioned. Ought fact are such constructivist facts. Because they are founded in social reality, a naturalistic theory of ought facts is attractive. Because constructivist facts are always open to questioning, we can explain why the facts in social reality may found ought facts but are nevertheless not the final word about them.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherSpringervi
dc.subjectConstructivist Factsvi
dc.subjectBridge Between Is and Oughtvi
dc.titleConstructivist Facts as the Bridge Between Is and Oughtvi
dc.typeBookvi
Appears in Collections
OER - Pháp luật - Thể chế xã hội

Files in This Item:

Thumbnail
  • Constructivist Facts as the Bridge Between Is and Ought-2022.pdf
      Restricted Access
    • Size : 710,07 kB

    • Format : Adobe PDF